The causal link between money and happiness is an established term in traditional economic theory. A higher income is expected to enhance happiness by enabling the purchase of more significant goods, resulting in increased welfare. The impact of money on happiness tends to be more pronounced in developing nations due to the sensitivity associated with financial resources. There exists a paradox regarding this causal link that varies over time; studies have shown a positive correlation within specific time frames, but this correlation may not hold over the long term. Moreover, in line with the concept of income comparison, self-assessed happiness and satisfaction scores are considered valid and reliable indicators of utility. The findings suggest that an individual's sense of utility is shaped more by their income relative to peers than by their absolute income level. The reference-income hypothesis, which is widely accepted in income comparison theory, posits that people are more concerned about their income in relation to a socially defined reference group.
Although Indigenous individuals with higher personal income tended to report slightly greater life satisfaction than those with less income, they were still significantly happier overall than their Western counterparts, even at lower income levels. Interestingly, the community in which one lives appears to influence life satisfaction—some villages reported more content residents than others. However, this variation was not tied to the community's overall income, contrasting the trends seen in Western nations as well as other smaller, non-Western countries around the globe. Despite the global emphasis on happiness, research indicates that people from different nations and cultures interpret, strive for, and define happiness in various ways. For instance, American citizens often link happiness to personal accomplishments, feelings of joy and excitement, success, and freedom, whereas many Asian cultures associate happiness with social harmony, moderation, good fortune, personal connections, and a sense of calm and relaxation.
While the concept of happiness is universal, its measurement and understanding are far from uniform. Given the intricate and subjective nature of happiness, researchers have introduced multiple terms to standardize both its measurement and the assessment of factors affecting it. The psychological concepts of subjective well-being (SWB) and life satisfaction have been utilized in the literature as measures of happiness. SWB evaluates how individuals assess their own lives and view their well-being, while life satisfaction gauges how an individual's desired goals compare to their perception of their current circumstances.
Also Read:
Climate Change and the Choice of Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change in Bangladesh
The role of foreign direct investment on Economic growth in Bangladesh
The observation that affluent individuals generally report higher satisfaction with their lives might lead one to believe that amassing wealth is the most straightforward path to happiness. However, the elements that genuinely contribute to happiness often come without a price tag. There are indeed alternative pathways to achieving a fulfilling life. The happiness disparity between the wealthiest and the most impoverished individuals is significant. Variations in income and wealth accounted for over half (around 58%) of the difference in happiness levels between the less content low-income participants and the highest score on the scale. It’s somewhat comforting to consider that wealthy individuals may not experience significantly more happiness than the middle class. This notion is supported by a famous 2010 study conducted by Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deaton, both of whom won the Nobel Prize in Economics. They concluded that happiness only rises with income until it reaches $75,000; beyond that point, they argued, additional income has no effect on overall happiness. Conversely, research published in 2021 by Matthew Killingsworth from the University of Pennsylvania indicated that happiness continues to rise with income significantly beyond $75,000, showing no signs of plateauing. To resolve these conflicting findings, Kahneman and Killingsworth collaborated in what is termed an adversarial collaboration, working alongside Penn Integrates Knowledge Professor Barbara Mellers as a mediator. In a new paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the trio demonstrates that, on average, higher incomes correlate with increasing levels of happiness. Research indicates that a well-functioning welfare system characterized by high progressive taxes and redistribution can improve the subjective well-being of its least affluent citizens without diminishing the well-being of those at the wealthier end of the spectrum. New field studies are making significant progress in examining how money influences happiness. Instead of merely observing the connection between income and happiness, these studies focus on how randomly assigned financial increases causally impact the happiness of various populations. The growing consensus from this research is that money does indeed contribute to happiness. Furthermore, recent studies indicate that increases in wealth enhance happiness for both the poor and the rich, though the less affluent experience a much greater boost in happiness from financial transfers compared to their wealthier counterparts. As most cash transfer studies have occurred in developing nations, it remains uncertain how much income actually increases happiness among those who are already well-off. Investigating the causal relationship between wealth and happiness across different income levels will be an important future focus. “In simple terms, this implies that for the majority of people, higher incomes relate to increased happiness,” remarks Killingsworth, a senior fellow at Wharton and lead author of the paper. “The only exception is individuals who, despite being financially secure, feel unhappy. For instance, if you’re wealthy and unhappy, acquiring more money won’t resolve that. For everyone else, a greater income correlates with higher happiness, albeit to varying extents.” Killingsworth, Kahneman, and Mellers explored a new hypothesis suggesting the existence of both a content majority and an unhappy minority. They theorized that happiness continues to increase for the former as their income rises, while the latter experiences enhanced happiness only until reaching a specific income limit, after which their happiness no longer improves. Reaching these conclusions would have been difficult without the collaboration of both research teams, according to Mellers, who believes that adversarial collaborations are one of the most effective methods for settling scientific disputes.
In conclusion, it should be recognized that while money plays a role in emotional well-being, it is not the ultimate solution. “While money is among several factors that contribute to happiness, it isn’t the key to finding joy, although it may provide some assistance.”
FAQ Here:
Can money be a cause of happiness?
In recent the researchers found that among people earning $200,000 or more, extra money provided extra happiness. There doesn't seem to be a limit to the impact money has on mental well-being. In this reality Money increases happiness out of the $75,000 threshold, revers previous research.
Does money bring all happiness?
More money increases happiness above $75,000 , Researchers research this question and they found -the authors of the paper suggest that there is a link to greater happiness for many, but not all, people. For 80% of people, happiness increases with income above $75,000.